The new Flash creative team of writers Robert Venditti & Van Jensen, and penciller Brett Booth debut and straight away … dismay me.
They open with a flashforward to five years in the future, when things are looking distinctly gloomy for our hero because, well, don’t they always? I really don’t care what’s happening with Flash in a potential future. We’ve most of us read the X-Men’s Days of Future Past, that was a brilliant story, original for comics, but the ‘something’s wrong with the future’ bit has been done to death since then (not least in the X-Men comics themselves). There’s no tension in this trampled trope – a defining event is changed, but the multiverse means that while the bad future is averted for the version of the characters we follow, it survives as a sliver of time. Which is depressing – the heroes win, but they lose.
Flash #30 instantly improves when it joins the Now. Central City is a mess after the events of Forever Evil, but on a personal level, things are looking up for Barry Allen. He’s set to be reinstated as a full-time member of the crime lab after a temporary demotion. All he has to do is get the nod from sinisterly named police psychiatrist Rebecca Janus, who’s seeing pretty much every law person in the city following the trauma of ‘the Crime Syndicate’s wave of terror’.
Girlfriend Patty Spivot gives Barry a new watch in a bid to improve his constant tardiness. Which seems ridiculous – she knows Barry has responsibilities both as a cop and a superhero, yet she’s asking him to, basically, wear a nag on his wrist. By the end of the issue the movement is losing time, a clue to something or other – remember the unmotivated close-ups on a prison guard’s watch in issue 24 that had me scratching my head mid-review? That never went anywhere, and that watch seemed to be losing time too.




Wally hasn't been cast,people figure when he does show up he will be because they cast iris and her father as black.
LikeLike
I liked Robert Vendetti's writing on Demon Knights enough that I had high hopes for this issue, despite not tending to like Brett Booth's work. Unfortunately, there are some signs that the pair haven't quite clicked yet. The scene with Forrest on the park bench, for instance, could have been handled with much more subtlety — the intentions to do so seem to be there. But instead, possibly because of the angle and distance from which he was drawn, he was given a spectacularly ham-handed dialogue balloon to get to point across. (“Sob sob… so many dead… sob!”) I suspect that was a moment Venditti would have preferred to handle more quietly, but the art didn't allow that. (And possibly his script was too packed to allow Booth to take more of a moment to focus on Forrest, as well. It takes two to tango.) Hopefully these rough edges will subside, or Vendetti will find a collaborator more suited to what he's trying to do.
Then again, Vendetti named the counselor “Dr. Janus,” so perhaps subtlety's not what he's aiming for. We'll see where that goes, but nowhere good, I suspect.
As for Wally, I look forward to meeting him. Black, white, dead in the future or not, none of that tells me a whole lot. Next week's annual will hopefully give us a lot more in that regard.
LikeLike
Yep.
LikeLike
You weren't impressed by the Forrest scene? >sob< The dialogue there was a bit rich, maybe the odd >snif< or! better still! let Booth do the heavy lifting there. Let's hope the early kinks get worked out, Rob.
LikeLike