Justice League 3000 #1 review


It’s the 31st century – do you know who your heroes are? Here’s Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, the Flash and Green Lantern, the Justice League, reborn to deliver paradise back to the people from whom it’s been snatched away. But do they have what it takes? Some of the superbeings we meet in this debut issue seem as likely to cripple one another as restore peace and harmony: Batman and Superman hate each other and Wonder Woman is pure Amazon rage. The Flash is unnerved by these three, while Green Lantern lacks the control of green energy he once had.

‘Once’? Yes, this is Clark, Bruce, Diana, Hal and Barry – and yet it’s not. Recreated from cell samples kept for 1000 years by project Cadmus, they lack many of the motivations, and all of the direct experiences which made the 21st-century originals the heroes they were. So Superman and Batman know ‘they’ were once best friends, but certainly don’t feel it. The Flash has super-speed, but not the aura which protected him. Diana hasn’t even a semblance of humanity. And Hal’s energy isn’t Oan, so lacks finesse.

But they want to do the job for which they’ve been brought back – heroic drive or scientists’ programming? They certainly don’t know, but teen industrialists Teri and twin brother Terry, who oversee the Justice League project, do. A complicated pair, the so-called Wonder Twins of Cadmusworld are looking out for the greater good – while considering killing the originator of the project, Ariel Masters. Their former mentor, she’s now on the run in the hellhole that is Bradbury 7 on the Hanuman system.

The physical action this time sees the League out to stop the possessed horde of the Convert, one of the five who transformed the near-perfect Commonwealth of worlds to a collection of war-torn, poverty and disease-ridden planets (click on image to enlarge – and dig that hideous Wonder Woman).


It’s good, as we see what the members can and can’t do, but the emotional action is better. The highlight of the issue is a pair of pages in which the members are debriefed by the off-screen twins (and what’s the betting they’re not natural twins, but Cadmus clones), and we get a good look at their personalities. It’s a deft scene from plotter Keith Giffen and scripter JM DeMatteis, sharply drawn by Howard Porter. While these pages look to have Giffen breakdowns – tell me that’s not a Giffen head on Hal, below – it could be that Porter was a fan of Giffen’s Five Year Gap Legion of Super-Heroes, and he’s channelling the approach there.


Whatever the case, Porter acquits himself well throughout the book, depicting a future that’s dark, but not off-puttingly so. I want to spend time here, exploring its avenues, getting to know the people. I’d avoid the weird vermin, though – the mechanical birds and bugs of Cadmusworld are rather more appealing, even though there’s likely as much nastiness behind the antiseptic glitz as on the Hindu-referencing Hanuman planets.

The visual aspect that’s not appealing is the costumes. Batman looks too Beyond. Superman has a clunky shield and the stupid scales of his big screen counterpart. Wonder Woman has a loincloth that recalls a nappy and a tiara that looks to be choking her. Flash has goggles he doesn’t pull over his eyes and a daft Wild West neckerchief. And Green Lantern is a floating blanket.

All of which can be tweaked. My takeaway from this opener is that Giffen and DeMatteis – the writers behind the hugely successful Eighties JLA revamp – have done it again. We’re in a dystopia, but things aren’t relentlessly grim – the League is here to turn the lights back on, and I’ve no doubt there’ll be a bit of comedy along the way. The main thing is that unlike many of DC’s New 52 books, Justice League Beyond gives the impression of having a well-worked story to tell. Other books ladle out incident on the fly, but distanced from the 21st-century DC Universe, the creators here are free to go their own way. References to such classic concepts as Jack Kirby’s Great Disaster and Cadmus are intriguing nods to old continuities, but won’t necessarily play out as previously.

I thank Giffen and DeMatteis for having the confidence to set out the story in their first chapter – too many comics these days rely on ‘mystery’ to keep us buying. But we’re told that, yes, these are the original heroes, sort of, this is their mission and this is why it won’t be easy.

(Mind, I’m not convinced that this is in fact a reborn Barry Allen – he had blue eyes and blond hair, this Flash has green eyes and ginger locks, like a certain Wally West; did someone at the lab mislabel a Petri dish?)

The elephant in the room is the Legion of Super-Heroes – where are the 31st century’s greatest super-teens? I don’t have a Scooby. Do they exist on Earth, which we’ve not seen yet? There’s no inkling of their existence here, so far as I can see. And that’s fair enough – I want the LSH to return as their own thing, perhaps in a different version of DC’s future. They’ve already done the ‘freedom fighters in a dark universe’ bit in Giffen’s aforementioned Eighties book. Let’s see if the all-new, all-old Justice League can do as well.

17 thoughts on “Justice League 3000 #1 review

  1. I had thought the last issue of “Legion of Super-Heroes” tried to establish the Legion was in the future of Earth-2, leaving Earth-1 open for this.


  2. I read and reviewed it over on AiPT and I honestly really enjoyed this book. I wasn't sure what to expect with it, since I didn't know a single thing about it until last night (when someone actually revealed the clone angle thing). I like the characters, their personalities, the potential with the comic itself, and for the first time ever, I like Howard Porter's artwork. It's surprisingly good, since I didn't have a favorable opinion of his work in JLA. I'm genuinely interested in seeing more next month and I hope it's good.


  3. Looking forward to reading your thoughts. I've been avoiding Bleeding Cool, for one, on new comic days, as they get a tad spoiler crazy. Ditto their night-before 'from the comic shop' things.


  4. Indeedy, I'm sure I reviewed some of them – but the Morrison/Fisch Action period has a Mxyzptlk dispensation … I expect details to drop away. We've already had the Doomsday references contradicted by recent Superman/Wonder Woman comics.


  5. It should be up now if you want to read it. Honestly, after reading all of my DC books today, this was the best of the bunch from the company (now the best comic this week was Manifest Destiny #2, but that's another story).


  6. Mis-labeling a petri dish? Giffen & DeMatteis have promised that some big twist is coming early–essentially they said that we've been lied to about something in the premise of issue #1. My money says that the cell samples used on the clones weren't from the Justice League, but from the Crime Syndicate. That fits the appearance/personalities/memory gaps we've shown this issue…


  7. The Legion connections I have to discount. The Convert seems to have been of the Five mentioned in the script, so Fatal Five is out and there was never a Commonwealth in Legion stories. And that E-2 thing in Legion's last issue completely got Superman's death wrong even before Robinson revived Clark.

    The twist I'm expecting from the writers about the 'clones' is them not being clones at all. Barry 3K's visual changes feel like a clue to me. Pre-New 52 clones were written as nearly impossible in story and a long ago Legion story had future clones going boom. I go on record predicting JL3K was created by grafting JL DNA onto natives of its time period…


  8. Superboy-Prime has been restored to his place punching the walls of the universe, I reckon…

    Yeah, I assume there will be some sort of LSH reboot, given that it's a property that should be able to make DC money. But heaven knows. Geoff Johns has a soft spot for them, so I assume they'll be back. But Johns being Johns, Matter-Eater Lad will now only eat people.


  9. That is such a clever idea, Steve, I'd be very interested were that to be the case. I can see all kinds of story possibilities. Oi, Giffen, are you out there? Send Steve money!


  10. I've read the first two issues now and I'm not sure I'll continue. It's not impossible to engage a reader in a story that has no likeable characters, but it's quite a hard sell, and there's not enough actual story to hang the mystery on. In fact it's mostly the JL bickering on an endless loop with no actual direction to it.


  11. I'm intrigued enough to keep reading, but I see your point about the characters. The only really sympathetic one is Barry or rather 'Barry'. I'll let you know if things change.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.